<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Emerald Coast Pain Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress</link>
	<description>For those who suffer from chronic pain on the Emerald Coast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:48:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Migraine&#8217;s &#8211; Often Misdiagnosed</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2012/02/16/migraines-often-misdiagnosed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2012/02/16/migraines-often-misdiagnosed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cervicogenic headache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tension headache]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not sure but I think 80% of everyone out there has migraine&#8217;s. Often, they are told this by their primary doctor and the patient takes this diagnosis to heart. As a pain management doctor I get very annoyed when people are given a diagnosis without a proper work up. It would be as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure but I think 80% of everyone out there has migraine&#8217;s. Often, they are told this by their primary doctor and the patient takes this diagnosis to heart. As a pain management doctor I get very annoyed when people are given a diagnosis without a proper work up. It would be as if I had a patient with a lump and told them that they had cancer. Obviously, more information is needed to make a correct diagnosis. There are numerous types of headaches; some common and some not, but not everyone has migraines. Believe it or not, true migraines are very specific types of headaches. Migraines are what are know as vascular headaches. This implies that the headache is from a vasoconstrictor or tightening of the blood vessels in the brain. The exact cause for this vasoconstriction is unknown but it may be due to elevated neural activity in the cortex of the brain. Migraines are much more common in women then men and often there are hormonal issues associated with the migraines. Migraines are usually unilateral or involves one side of the head. There is usually a prodrome which is a syndrome of symptoms that occurs before the headache ever occurs. The prodrome includes symptoms such as mood changes, tiredness and vague abdominal pain. Many people also have an aura, which involves symptoms immediately before the headache such as visual changes, olfactory changes such as unusual smells, even numbness or vertigo. Also, migraine generally occur infrequently, like once a month and definitely ot every day. The important issue that I am trying to state is that most people who come into my office an have been told that they have migraines have something else. Most people I see have chronic headaches that are bilateral in nature and often occur frequently. In most of these people, their headaches are often related to the neck. The headaches literally are coming from the neck region. These types of headaches are due to the joints, muscles, discs or even the nerves of the neck resulting in spasms in the neck region that affect the nerves that run up the back of the head. These headaches are often bilateral and often chronic and regular. They are often everyday headaches and unless you understand the cause you&#8217;ll never fix them. These neck related headaches can be called tension headaches, cervicogenic headaches, or occipital neuralgia. These headaches can be just as severe as migraines and people should not think that just because their headache is severe that it must be a migraine. If your symptoms fit into the non-migraine type of headache then the first thing is to accept that your headache isn&#8217;t a migraine and the second is to try and figure out why you are having these headaches. I am not going to get into the work up of cervicogenic headaches but an appropriate evaluation can often lead to a possible treatment. Often an MRI is needed but sometimes the only finding is reduction in the cervical curvature. Nonetheless, the treatment for migraines is different than cervicogenic headaches. Migraines have specific medications that treat them while cervicogenic headaches have treatments such as injections and medications to reduce the muscular spasms. Also, if there are obvious abnormalities on the MRI then those could be addressed to resolve the headaches. The key is to realize what your true diagnosis is. Once you have that then true treatment can occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2012/02/16/migraines-often-misdiagnosed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fibromyalgia &#8211; Does everyone have it?</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2012/01/24/fibromyalgia-does-everyone-have-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2012/01/24/fibromyalgia-does-everyone-have-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fibromyalgia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are several diagnoses that are troubling to me as a pain medicine physician. These are RLS, Migraines, Chronic Fatique Syndrome and Fibromyalgia. I find these troubling because many doctors rapidily diagnose people with these issues and then the patient takes that diagnosis to heart. Also troubling is that these issues are what I call [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several diagnoses that are troubling to me as a pain medicine physician. These are RLS, Migraines, Chronic Fatique Syndrome and Fibromyalgia. I find these troubling because many doctors rapidily diagnose people with these issues and then the patient takes that diagnosis to heart. Also troubling is that these issues are what I call a dumping ground because they don&#8217;t have any real treatments except pain medications, except true migraines. Thus people get diagnosed with the disease Fibromyalgia and then there is not real treatment for their problem except to live with the pain and take pills. I feel that this is a disservice to the patient since probably 90% of the people diagnosed with Fibromyalgia don&#8217;t really have the disorder. There are specific findings for Fibromyalgia which include trigger points in every quadrant of the body. Thus people with localized pain don&#8217;t qualify for Fibromyalgia. People generally have pain all over their body with Fibromyalgia and not just in certain areas. People who don&#8217;t fit this criteria should have other potential sources of pain ruled out. In the past, we required around 20 trigger points in various regions to be present to qualify as Fibromyalgia. This is very vague since if you push on most people&#8217;s skin, they will have trigger points in various places of their body. Nonetheless, the object here is that fibromyalgia involves the entire body. The patient usually has a burning component to the pain and has been worked up for possible entities such as lupus, lyme disease, psychological issues, hormonal issues, etc. It is vital that other options be ruled out before diagnosing someone with fibromyalgia since the diagnosis of fibromyalgia carries a very poor prognosis and most of the treatments involve medications or minor injections. In my experience, 80 to 90% of the people who come to me with the presumptive diagnosis of fibromyalgia really have some other issue and much of the time, that issue is treatable. It is important to realize that Fibromyalgia is a diagnosis of exclusion, meaning there is no test to confirm that someone has the disease but you give them the diagnosis because they don&#8217;t have any other diseases and their symptoms correlate with fibromyalgia. Treatment often includes medications such as Lyrica or Neurontin, which are anti-seizure medications that are utilized to quiet down nerves associated with the disorder. Anti-depressants are also utilized for both their psychotropic effects and their effects on neuro-transmission. They also help with sleep. Narcotic medications can be utilized but generally have a poor response and result in significant escalation to control the pain. These patients often require long term care that includes cooperation with the psychiatrist, primary physician and the pain doctor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2012/01/24/fibromyalgia-does-everyone-have-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2011/02/13/february-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2011/02/13/february-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sciatica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leg pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiculopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sciatica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This month’s topic is Sciatica.   What is Sciatica? We as physicians generally don’t use this term since it is vague. People generally don’t have complete damage or compression of the entire sciatic nerve. Generally people have compression of one of the many nerves that comprise the sciatica nerve. The sciatic nerve has branches form [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>This month’s topic is Sciatica.</h1>
<p> </p>
<p>What is Sciatica? We as physicians generally don’t use this term since it is vague. People generally don’t have complete damage or compression of the entire sciatic nerve. Generally people have compression of one of the many nerves that comprise the sciatica nerve. The sciatic nerve has branches form the lower lumbar and upper sacral levels. Thus damage or compression of any of these nerves (L4 to S3) can lead to what is called sciatica. When one of these nerves is compromised, we refer to this as a radiculopathy. Thus, when people have a herniated disc or spinal stenosis that causes pressure on these nerves, usually only one or two of the nerves that comprise the sciatic nerve are affected, and not the entire sciatic nerve. This is important because when surgery or injections are considered they must be directed at the exact level that has the nerve injury. Thus, we use the word radiculopathy to describe these conditions since it is more specific.</p>
<p>When speaking of nerves, it is important to realize that a nerve such as the sciatic nerve is not only made up of numerous nerve roots from the spinal cord but also that each of these nerve roots has thousands of nerves within it. There might be a million nerves (or neurons) in the sciatic nerve. The best way to think of the sciatic nerve, or any nerve, is like a telephone cable. One cable has numerous wires within it. Generally, the outer telephone wires are used for homes near the source while the deep inner wires are for the more distant homes. The cable thus gets smaller as it reaches the last homes, which use those deep wires in the middle of the cable. Your nerves are the same way. The outer portion of the main nerve has small nerves that innervate the regions near the spine while the deep middle of the nerve innervates the distant areas such as the hands or feet. This is important since when something, such as a herniated disc, pushes on the nerve, the outer little nerves are affect first. This is why people will often get shoulder pain or buttock pain before they get arm pain. Only when the nerve get further compresses does those deep inner nerves get affected and then the pain radiates down the arm or leg. This also explains why some people can have pain that one day goes further down the arm or leg than on other days. It all depends on the extent of compression of the nerve bundle.</p>
<p>When people get numbness or weakness, this simply implies that the transmission of the nerve is gone due to damage. No sensation means “no nerve information” or the telephone wire has been cut. As long as the nerve is working, you’ll have pain and muscular cramps, but when it goes too far, those cramps become weakness and the pain becomes numbness. This nerve damage often can be resolved with surgery but can sometimes become permanent. In a later newsletter we will discuss the treatments of nerve compression but this month I am focusing on helping you to understand the anatomy. It is also to understand that due to our spinal curvature, most problems occur at those curves. These points are Cervical levels C5-6-7, Thoracic levels T6-7-8, and Lumbar levels L4-5-S1. These levels also result in the most pain since C5-6-7 innervates much of the arm while L4-5-S1 innervates much of the leg. Thoracic issues are less common due to the rigidity of the thorax and usually only represent 10% of spinal issues. I hope you now realize that when we speak of spinal problems, we are talking about spinal nerve root issues and peripheral nerve problems such as the sciatic nerve.</p>
<p>God Bless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2011/02/13/february-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>December Newsletter &#8211; Sacroplasty</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/12/07/december-newsletter-sacroplasty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/12/07/december-newsletter-sacroplasty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacroilitis or SI joint Pain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fairly common problem, especially for women, is sacroilitis or sacroiliac joint syndrome. This is pain that arises from the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). The SIJ is the joint between the pelvis and the sacrum. It is commonly those little dimple area that people see on their backside. These joints generally fuse early in life and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fairly common problem, especially for women, is sacroilitis or sacroiliac joint syndrome. This is pain that arises from the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). The SIJ is the joint between the pelvis and the sacrum. It is commonly those little dimple area that people see on their backside. These joints generally fuse early in life and there is significant debate as to whether the pain is from the joints or the tissue overlying them.</p>
<p>The pain associated with SIJ disease is usually located over the buttock area but it can radiate. In fact, there have been many cases where people had fusion surgeries for possible pinched nerves only to find out later that the problem was SIJ related. Thus, the pain can be local or radiate all the way down the leg. As stated previously, women are more affected than men and this is probably due to the wider pelvis in women and childbirth which stretches out the pelvic tissues.</p>
<p>In my experience, the most common cause of the SIJ pain is due to torn ligaments over the SIJ and not the joint itself. A lot of the tissues connect to the bone at this point and these tissues get torn with time and lead to a tendonitis type of picture.  Usually the pain is localized but as stated before can radiate. This syndrome can cause women much distress and pain.</p>
<p>What to do about it? For years injections were utilized to temporarily treat the pain in the joints. Surgeons have used fusions to treat this issue with a six inch incision and long recovery times. I wrote the first paper on an endoscopic approach to treating this problem with a 60% cure rate and a one inch incision.</p>
<p>Of interest, a new procedure has been developed which involves a large bore needle and the insertion of “cement” into the joint area to fuse the joint. The study was done on cadavers but it revealed that the procedure reduced SIJ motion by 50% in patients with SIJ fractures (usually after auto accidents). The question is whether this approach would be viable for regular SIJ pain not associated with fractures. If it is then it would represent an even more minimally invasive approach to treating this problem. It is possible that the insertion of the cement would even destroy some of the ligaments that are torn and causing pain. Currently, there are kits available for doing this procedure. The kits are made for spinal fractures but could be utilized for SIJ issues. It is especially useful for those who cannot undergo the SIJ surgery I devised or a SIJ fusion, such as in old or frail individuals. There is more information on SIJ problems on our website: www.emeraldcoastpain.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/12/07/december-newsletter-sacroplasty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/09/22/october-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/09/22/october-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Low Back Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intradiscal injections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low back pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methylene Blue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October Newsletter A recent study by the Chinese reveals that the usage of Methylene Blue, which is a common dye, when injected into the intervertebral discs may result in significant and permanent reduction of low back pain. The exact method of how this interaction occurs is unknown but the results reveal a 50% reduction in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October Newsletter</p>
<p>A recent study by the Chinese reveals that the usage of Methylene Blue, which is a common dye, when injected into the intervertebral discs may result in significant and permanent reduction of low back pain. The exact method of how this interaction occurs is unknown but the results reveal a 50% reduction in pain in the treated groups. The study involved 136 individuals, of which 72 were utilized for the study while the others were eliminated due to inconclusive discography results. Half of these patients had a sham injection of saline while the others received the Methylene blue. Results were obtained at two years out, which is standard for long-term studies. The statistical analysis of the data revealed that the results were indeed significant.</p>
<p>What does this mean? Is Methylene blue the cure all for disc related low back pain?</p>
<p>The hard thing with such data is understanding what a 50% reduction correlates to. A novice would think that everyone got half of his or her pain eliminated. In reality, it implies that of the people who received the Methylene blue the average improvement was 50%. Thus some people got no relief while others received much more relief. It is also important to note that the Placebo group has a 15% significant improvement rate. It is also important to note that when the scores were analyzed using Oswestry scales, which is a tricky tests that tries to eliminate bias or errors in the questioning, the results dropped to 35% improvement compared to the 15% for placebo.</p>
<p>So again, you ask, what does this mean?</p>
<p>It means that Methylene blue may be a treatment option for people with chronic low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease. It also implies that between 35 and 50% of the people will get some degree of significant, permanent relief from the injection. Not bad for a fairly benign chemical. We have been injecting Methylene blue into selected patients for the past six months. Obviously, we do not have long term results at this time, but it appears that 50% of the people get some degree of significant pain reduction with the injection..</p>
<p>This isn’t the first intradiscal injection that has been tested. We have been injecting a mixture of Glucosamine, Chondroitin, and dextrose into the discs since 2004. The results with this injection I think have been better at around 65% improvement (65% of the patients get significant permanent improvement). We have also been injecting Ozone gas into the discs for the past two years. This is based on several studies from Europe that revealed that Ozone gas resulted in 90% success rates for patients with disc related pain. Our results don’t correlate with that and I believe the results are more 50-50 with half of the patients seeing some degree of significant improvement.</p>
<p>None of these injections is considered experimental since there have been studies on all of them. I generally utilize the Glucosamine mixture first, then either the Methylene blue or Ozone gas. I also utilize a discectomy first if it is feasible since there are many studies on discectomy for low back pain offering a 70% success rate.</p>
<p>Now what all this really means!</p>
<p>It means that discogenic or low back pain from degenerative disc disease is hard to treat but there are a multitude of treatment options. Unfortunately, none of them offer greater than a70% success rate. Even spinal fusions only offer a 50 to 70% success rate for disc related low back pain. So if you suffer from low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease, you shouldn’t give up if one option doesn’t work since there are other options and the fact that one didn’t work doesn’t rule out the other from possibly being effective.</p>
<p>Let’s pray for a pain free world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/09/22/october-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Artificial Disc</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/08/16/the-artificial-disc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/08/16/the-artificial-disc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADR artificial disc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#8217;t long ago when the artificial disc was considered the cure-all to back problems. The studies that were done in Europe showed success rates that were very impressive. 90% cure rates or so they say. It has been over five years since the artificial disc was approved for usage in the U.S.A. and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t long ago when the artificial disc was considered the cure-all to back problems. The studies that were done in Europe showed success rates that were very impressive. 90% cure rates or so they say. It has been over five years since the artificial disc was approved for usage in the U.S.A. and the &#8220;hoopla&#8221; has diminished. The American studies showed success rates of around 67% which isn&#8217;t much different than any other spinal surgery and the once touted cure has drifted from the spotlight. When the artificial disc or ADR came out, I thought that everyone would be utilizing the device by now. The irony is that it still isn&#8217;t mainstream and due to the mediocre results, it probably never will be. In fact during the time that the ADR has been around, one medical device manufacturer paid almost a billion dollars for the rights to a new fusion device call the &#8220;X-stop&#8221; which fuses the spine at the spinous processes. The X-stop is for another discussion but obviously the big companies saw that the ADR had limited use. Personally, I like the ADR for some things. It is never a first line choice due to the complexity of the surgery, but it could be considered for discogenic low back pain that isn&#8217;t resolved by minimal invasive modalities. I don&#8217;t see much promise with spinal stenosis since the surgery technique doesn&#8217;t allow opeing of the spinal canal. Thus, the ADR is really a disc issue device and if there is bone impinging on the cord, it may be of limited value. As with regular fusions, there is a reasonable failure rate and when these devices fail the solution is to fuse the spine. The other questions invole instability with multiple levels since a significant degree of spinal ligaments anteriorly are affected. I have seen up to 3 levels of the spine done but usually only one or two are performed. The ADR, an interesting device that has been around for twenty years but only available in this country for 5 years. The ADR, as with everything in spine care, has it ups and downs and I believe should be considered a second line treatment option. Always try minimalistic treatments first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/08/16/the-artificial-disc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intradiscal Injections</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/08/05/intradiscal-injections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/08/05/intradiscal-injections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intradiscal injections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discogenic low back pain is a major concern for most people. It is the most common cause of low back pain (LBP). Amazingly, until the late 1980&#8242;s the discs were thought to not have sensation and thus could not cause pain. We learned that the outer surface is very well innervated and yes definitely can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discogenic low back pain is a major concern for most people. It is the most common cause of low back pain (LBP). Amazingly, until the late 1980&#8242;s the discs were thought to not have sensation and thus could not cause pain. We learned that the outer surface is very well innervated and yes definitely can cause pain. In fact, now it is the most common cause of LBP. The gold standard has always been a discectomy for the treatment of disc pain but recently certain injections have been available for the treatment of disc related pain. These include; a mixture of glucosamine/chondroitin/dextrose, Ozone gas, and Melthylene blue. The success rates with these injections are around 50 to 60% effective. That means that 50 to 60% of those treated get some significant improvement with the injection. We have performed all of these and in my experience, the success rate is around 50%. We have seen better results with the Glucosamine mixture than the other two but if one type of injection fails, we have seen success with the others. The Glucosamine mixture had a published success rate of around 60% which is close to what we see. The Ozone gas was developed by an Italian team and the success rate they published was near 90% effective. We have utilize this for years and at best we feel it is a 50% success rate. As for the methylene blue, which is a dye, the published rates were around 80% by a Chinese team but we need another year to see what our long term results are. Nonetheless, these are excellent options to consider prior to surgery since they don&#8217;t involve anything more than a needle. Also, it is important to remember that the success rates of spine surgery are around 70% which isn&#8217;t must greater than these injections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/08/05/intradiscal-injections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sacroiliac Joint Pain</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/07/22/22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/07/22/22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sacroilitis or SI joint Pain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sacroiliac joint pain or SIJ pain is a common disorder that is seen in females much more than males. The SIJ is comprised of the surface between the sacrum and the iliac bones. The two iliac bones comprise the pelvis. The joint is essentially non-mobile in the vast majority of patients and although some believe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacroiliac joint pain or SIJ pain is a common disorder that is seen in females much more than males. The SIJ is comprised of the surface between the sacrum and the iliac bones. The two iliac bones comprise the pelvis. The joint is essentially non-mobile in the vast majority of patients and although some believe the pain is from a hyper mobile joint, we believe that the pain originates from the tissues overlying the joint surface. The region of the SIJ is where many of the ligaments and tendons adhere to the sacrum that supports the spine. These tendons get damaged and torn and this leads to a chronic tendonitis type of picture which causes localized pain that is tender to the touch. The pain is usually contained to the region of the SIJ but in some people the pain can radiate into the buttock and even into the leg. Nonetheless, the common presentation is unilateral low back to buttock pain. Often a “knot” of tissue is felt under the skin where the pain is present. This “knot” of tissue represents the torn tissues and since the tendon tissues heal poorly, the pain tends to be persistent. Probably the wider and shallower pelvis of the female leads to the greater prevalence of the disease in women. Also, childbirth may lead to some the tissues overlying the pelvis to become damaged. The SIJ syndrome is also seen in males but less frequently. The diagnosis of the disorder includes tenderness over the joint region and elimination of the pain with a selective SIJ injection. There are other tests, such as Patrick’s test but if a SIJ injection doesn’t eliminate the pain then think of other causes. The treatment of SIJ pain can be as simple as rest or a back brace with anti-inflammatory medications. Injections of a corticosteroid into the joint can lead to pain relief for several weeks or months. This can be a long term treatment option if the relief lasts at least two to three months. If the relief of the SIJ injection is of short-term benefit then one could consider a SIJ debridement surgery which was pioneered by the doctors at MicroSpine. The SIJ surgery removes the damaged ligamental tissues surrounding the SIJ. This leads to permanent relief of the pain is 60% of the people and involves an incision of less than one inch. Other options include SIJ fusion surgery which involves fusing the joint with metal hardware to reduce motion in the joint. This has a success rate of around 50% and involves a 6 inch incision. There are also treatments that use a needle that burns the tissues around the joint. This is called radiofrequency lesioning and uses electrical energy to create heat to burn the tissues. This works less than 50% of the time and lasts around 6 months. The important thing to remember is that SIJ pain is not always from a hyper mobile joint and that fusion of the joint works only 50% of the time. Thus, minimally invasive procedures offer better outcomes with less trauma and should be considered when appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/07/22/22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discogenic Low Back Pain</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/07/22/discogenic-low-back-pain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/07/22/discogenic-low-back-pain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Low Back Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not, up until the late 1980’s, it was thought that the discs themselves didn’t cause pain. It was known that a herniated disc could press on a nerve and cause pain but it was assumed that the disc didn’t have any innervation and thus couldn’t cause pain in and of itself. Studies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, up until the late 1980’s, it was thought that the discs themselves didn’t cause pain. It was known that a herniated disc could press on a nerve and cause pain but it was assumed that the disc didn’t have any innervation and thus couldn’t cause pain in and of itself. Studies revealled that the discs do have innervation but only on the outer annulus or the surface of the disc. This annulus get damaged due to forces that cause tears in its lining. these tears cause pain stimulation via the small nerves that innervate the surface of the disc. Thus we refer to this as annular pain or pain from the annular fibers of the disc. Since the 1990’s, discectomies have been the gold standard for disc related pain and usually have success rates of around 70%. Fusions surgeries have also been utilized for this type of pain but with success rates of 50 to 70%. Why do the discs cause pain? The tought is that the small tears in the annulus of the disc stretch the nerves that innervate the annulus and thus cause pain. The discectomy reduces the pressures in the disc and thus reduce the pain while the fusion solidifies the spine and thus no motion should equate with no pain. Obviously, neither of these surgeries are 100% effective, endoscopic disectomies offer a good success rate with low complications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/07/22/discogenic-low-back-pain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spine Surgery Success Rates</title>
		<link>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/07/22/spine-surgery-success-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/07/22/spine-surgery-success-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spine Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many spinal surgeries offer some kind of success rate but do you the patient really understand what is meant by “success”? Obviously success means that you had a positive outcome, but to what degree. Usually conventional spinal surgeries offer a good to excellent outcome in 50 to70% of patients. Usually, but not always, good to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many spinal surgeries offer some kind of success rate but do you the patient really understand what is meant by “success”? Obviously success means that you had a positive outcome, but to what degree. Usually conventional spinal surgeries offer a good to excellent outcome in 50 to70% of patients. Usually, but not always, good to excellent corresponds to a improvement level of 50 to 100%.  Thus, good to excellent may not mean a cure but implies usually at least 50% improvement. Some scientific papers use 25% or greater as a level of success or even any statistically significant change as evidence for success. Thus, it is important for you the patient to understand what is meant by a successful outcome. It is also important to realize that few studies offer improvement much above 80% for spinal surgeries of any type. What does all this mean? It means three things. 1. spinal surgery of any type, including endoscopic spinal surgery, is successful around 75% of time, give or take a few points and the improvement averages 75% reduction in pain for those people. 2. around 25% of the people don’t get better or have less than a 50% improvement level. This is important since with conventional surgery, those 25% may actually be worse after surgery! 3. No spine surgery is perfect in every patient and this is due to the complexity of the spine itself. Be very wary of a surgeon who says they have perfect results and if he does, ask if he can prove it. The reality is spine surgery isn’t perfect, but we at MicroSpine try to offer a minimally invasive approach that creates an incision of less than one inch with results similar or better to conventional surgery but with fewer outcomes. Honest answers from honest people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emeraldcoastpain.com/wordpress/wordpress/2010/07/22/spine-surgery-success-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

